Cases 71 - 80 of 401
Charles Brown, et al v. USA
as 20-60607
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRUDY BROWN and CHARLES BROWN
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21654
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denise Mejia v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2020cv01166
Defendant:
Charles Brown, Wesley Miller and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Denise Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04933
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85844
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72751
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52365
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Lorain County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2020cv00691
Defendant:
Denise Rakich, Sally Abel, Patrick M Hakos and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25566
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shenk v. Humane Society of Carroll Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Charles Brown, Carroll County, MD Government, Gail Kessler and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Shenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
