Cases 71 - 80 of 328
RODRIGUEZ-COLON v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04083
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO RODRIGUEZ-COLON
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, N. MANSI, J. O'BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON-VALDEZ v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03211
Plaintiff:
JUAN B. COLON VALDEZ
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leone v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS et al
as 2:2020cv03158
Defendant:
BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF OLYMPUS, OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
Kristin Leone, ANDREA CAJUSTE, GARY PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SHERMOT v. BUCCI et al
as 5:2020cv02719
Defendant:
IESHA COLON, MONICA I. WIGGINS, ROBERT LOUIS FELICIANI, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LORAINE MARIE SHERMOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv02288
Defendant:
ADAM WALKER, CODY ALBRIGHT, PETER IRELAND and others
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITHERSPOON v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv02288
Defendant:
ADAM WALKER, CODY ALBRIGHT, PETER IRELAND and others
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01830
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
KAYE COLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01512
Defendant:
CRAIG MARTELLA, CATERINA GALLELLI, CHARISE GALE and others
Plaintiff:
T.H. and TAMIERA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLON v. ANGLIKOWSKI et al
as 1:2020cv00036
Defendant:
MR. KNEPPER, SUPT. CAPPOZZA, LT. BASHIER and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS COLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COLON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
LUIS COLON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
