Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Pickle v. Curry et al
as 2:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Pickle
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Scooge, Nurse Kay and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottingham v. Curry
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
Willie Milton Cottingham
Defendant:
Chris Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Deidra Monet Blanchard , Joshua Blackmon , Cynthia Britton and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Chuck Hagel, Michael C Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottingham v. Curry
as 2:2012cv03816
Plaintiff:
Willie Milton Cottingham, III
Defendant:
Chris Curry
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv03646
Defendant:
Chris Curry , Michael Keith Gay , John Samaniego and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Laine Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Carter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00834
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curry Adams
Defendant:
F. Carter, Alabama Department of Corrections and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
