Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 354
KRODEL v. ROUSH
as 3:2021cv00010
Defendant: TRAVIS ROUSH
Plaintiff: DANNY LEE KRODEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. KNIGHT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03248
Defendant: TOMAW, BRAD, ROWL and others
Plaintiff: JERALD BROUDE, RICHARD M. REEVES, PATRICK B. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craft v. Meadows et al
as 3:2020cv00985
Defendant: Danny Meadows, Greg Grostefon, Angela Edwards and others
Plaintiff: William A Craft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. The Geo Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00952
Defendant: Wexford of Indiana, Moore, Mr Newkirk and others
Not Classified By Court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: Danny R Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv02457
Defendant: MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff: DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00783
Petitioner: Danny Perez
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROYSTER et al v. MINNETTE
as 3:2020cv00214
Plaintiff: David L Royster, Danny W. Pearson and DAVID L. ROYSTER
Defendant: Charles A. Minnette
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WATTS v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00188
Defendant: HON. ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: DANNY WATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHERRY v. THOMPSON
as 1:2020cv01970
Defendant: HARPER and THOMPSON
Plaintiff: DANNY CHERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Defendant: DANNY MITCHELL, DEA GOAD, KATHY ALVEY and others
Plaintiff: TEVIN R. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?