Cases 71 - 80 of 166
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2016mc91268
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
R. David Cohen
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Cohen
as 16-1703
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
R. DAVID COHEN
Interested Party:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
US v. Cohen
as 16-1682
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
R. DAVID COHEN
Interested Party:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Oberweis Securities, Inc. CRD #42060 v. Investors Insurance Corporation c/o Athene Annuity & Life Assurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv04228
Plaintiff:
Oberweis Securities, Inc. CRD #42060
Defendant:
Investors Insurance Corporation c/o Athene Annuity & Life Assurance Company, Fidelity & Guaranty Life , Americom Life & Annuity Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2016md02691
Defendant:
Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrews, Amador Herrara, Lyle Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cohen v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2016cv01778
Plaintiff:
David Cohen
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen v. Oberweis Dairy, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03278
Petitioner:
David Cohen
Respondent:
Oberweis Dairy, Inc., Oberweis Securities Inc and Darren Gene Niemann
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smith v. Cohen
as 1:2016cv10369
Plaintiff:
Lady Bird Smith
Defendant:
David Cohen and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
