Cases 71 - 80 of 363
David Edward Herrmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv09737
Petitioner:
David Edward Herrmann, o/b/o Tina M. Herrmann (Deceased)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Edward Herrman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jeffrey Ziegler, et al v. Correctional Industries, et al
as 21-35998
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT ZIEGLER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN HEGGE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN KORTOKRAX, DON MILLER and others
Couch v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv05804
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Couch, Sr
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson, Travis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
Melinda Adkins, Gerald Ed Andrews, Estate of Rich Romer and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Monsanto Company, Solutia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56973
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD KOCH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55389
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD COBB SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOCKMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51584
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD STOCKMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2021cv00279
Petitioner:
David Edward McLaughlin
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Espinal v. Laura Eldridge
as 21-16249
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD ESPINAL
Respondent / Appellee:
LAURA ELDRIDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
