Cases 71 - 80 of 165
Perez-Diaz v. Hano et al
as 3:2020cv00214
Petitioner:
Brenda Perez-Diaz
Respondent:
Dr. Ring, Mr. Sparks, Mr. Hano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Warden
as 1:2020cv00258
Respondent:
Warden, Psychology, Warden S. Ma'at' and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks, Issam Hussein Abu-Ghosh and Issam-Abu Gosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Diaz v. Hano et al
as 2:2020cv00752
Defendant:
Mr. Hano, Mr. Vail, Mrs. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Perez-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00720
Defendant:
I-X C.O. John/Jane Does, Kim Paton, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skaggs v. Maston et al
as 3:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Wexford Health Resources, Carla Deem, Dr. James Beane and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Saad et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Ian Connors, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodson v. The Federal Bureau of Prisoners (sic) et al
as 3:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
Tommy Everett Goodson
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisoners (sic), Dr. Emery McCoy and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Masias v. Hodges et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
S.I.S Aldrige, AUSA Flowers, Dr. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Masias
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bigley v. Jenkins
as 2:2020cv00510
Plaintiff:
Kelly Renee Bigley
Defendant:
Dr. Janet Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graening v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2020cv00400
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Randall Mutter, Tara Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Howard Graening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
