Cases 71 - 80 of 141
Wess v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Devion'tae Wess
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, FNU Nixon, FNU French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
John Doe, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00381
Plaintiff:
Ricco Dontae Walters
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Davis Correctional Facility, Oklahoma, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2017cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Core Civic, Chad Miller, FNU Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Ricco Dontae Walters
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Davis Correctional Facility, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groden v. Castloo et al
as 6:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Ali Groden
Defendant:
Tom Castloo, FNU Ogle, FNU Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donis Denby v. Bosco, et al
as 17-40598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONIS LEMOND DENBY
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU BOSCO, Warden, FNU HUNT, Correction Officer, FNU RUPERT, Warden and others
Carrillo v. Roesler et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Timothy Carrillo
Defendant:
Michael Roesler, Darin W Marcinkevicius, Virgil G McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Gainey et al
as 5:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Mack, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Gainey, Mike Rolls, FNU Spicher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Santedro Howell
Defendant:
FNU Hall, FNU Gammage, FNU McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
