Cases 71 - 80 of 3,482
NESTOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00807
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, INC., ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL OVERSIGHT BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LEE NESTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Capozzi v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Frank J. Capozzi
Respondent:
R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HELFRICH v. TRINSEO PLC et al
as 2:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
JONNIE HELFRICH
Defendant:
TRINSEO PLC, FRANK A. BOZICH and DAVID STASSE
Plessinger et al v. Primecare Medical, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Frank C. Plessinger and Michelle Plessinger
Defendant:
Primecare Medical, Inc, Justin Lensbower, Adele Rogers and others
Cross Defendant:
John Doe Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Miller III v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Frank Miller III
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MARRERO-NARDO v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Petitioner:
MR SAMUEL F MARRERO-NARDO, SR. and SAMUEL FRANK MARRERO-NARDO, SR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BERNADETTE MASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
