Cases 71 - 80 of 5,949
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Padilla, et al. v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
as 24-1736
Respondent:
YOLANY PADILLA, IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Seville Industries v. SBA
as 24-30170
Plaintiff:
Seville Industries, L.L.C.
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman and Janet Yellen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GUZMAN-THOMAS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03430
Plaintiff:
MARILYN GUZMAN-THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
