Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 182
Harris v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv05262
Plaintiff: Gregory Harris
Defendant: Monsanto Company, BASF Corporation, BASF SE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
HARRIS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2017cv23455
Defendant: State of Florida and Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Gregory Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2017cv00405
Petitioner: GREGORY HARRIS
Respondent: SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Gregory Harris
as 17-13785
Petitioner: In re: GREGORY HARRIS
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gregory Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 17-13487
Petitioner - Appellant: GREGORY HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN A. BARFIELD and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2017cv01555
Plaintiff: GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2017cv01554
Plaintiff: GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Harris v. USA, et al
as 17-13246
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, DADE COUNTY and others
Wood et al v.Sycamore Community School District Board of Education, et al.
as 1:2017cv00465
Plaintiff: John Wood and Catherine Wood
Defendant: Board of Education of the Sycamore Community School District , Frank Forsthoefel , Damon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?