Cases 71 - 80 of 307
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ronald Hill and Matthew Ronald Joseph Hill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. City Church et al
as 2:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Gleasons, City Church, Vatican and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Willow Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frame-Wilson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2020cv00424
Plaintiff:
Christian Sabol, Deborah Frame-Wilson, Gail Murphy and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
White et al v. Walla Walla County et al
as 4:2020cv05009
Defendant:
Tom Beyer and Walla Walla County
Plaintiff:
Jeana Hill and Lonnie White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keesling Hollywood Hill Management LLC et al v. King County
as 3:2020cv05031
Plaintiff:
Holly Towle, Susan Valenta and Keesling Hollywood Hill Management LLC
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv00053
Plaintiff:
Susan Valenta, Holly Towle, Keesling Hollywood Hill Management L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Washington Health Care Authority v. Azar et al
as 3:2019cv06137
Plaintiff:
State of Washington Health Care Authority
Defendant:
Providence St Peter Hospital, Kadlec Regional Medical Center, Providence Mount Carmel Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Broussard v. Tacoma News Tribune et al
as 3:2019cv06022
Defendant:
Craig Hill and Tacoma News Tribune
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Wilfred Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
