Cases 71 - 78 of 78
HEADY v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv92296
Plaintiff:
NORMA HEADY and NORMA HEADY
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
In re: Comm Bank N VA
as 08-3791
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REBECCA A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, ROBERT A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, RUTH J. DAVIS, a lawfully married couple and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DAVIDSON, ANTHONY DIXON, KATHY DIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tennessee, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO and PNC BANK NATL ASSOC, successor to CBNV
Defendant:
COMM BANK N VA and GRNTY NATL INS CO
Cupp v. Reed et al
as 2:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Steven O. Cupp
Defendant:
Richard Reed, Dane Heady, Joyce Francis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kalita v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Frank Phillip Kalita, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Joyce Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HEADY v. GUTTMAN GROUP, et al
as 2:2007cv00648
Plaintiff:
HAROLD H. HEADY
Defendant:
GUTTMAN GROUP, GUTTMAN OIL COMPANY and MON RIVER TOWING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
USA v. Popplewell et al
as 5:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Robert Popplewell, Claudine Conrad Popplewell, Angela Popplewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 2:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harold Watts, K. M. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Vaughn v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Donta T. Vaughn
Defendant:
Martin Garza, C/O Tompkins, C/O Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
