Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Chauncey Simpson v. I. Martinez
as 13-15839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY REENE SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
I. MARTINEZ, Correctional Sgt. and J. S. WARFIELD
Morales-Melecio et al v. United States of America (Department of Health and Human Services)
as 3:2013cv01311
Plaintiff:
Luz Z. Morales-Melecio , Maria I. Martinez-Ortiz , Emilio Matos-Perez and others
Defendant:
United States of America (Department of Health and Human Services)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Gerardo R Silva et al
as 8:2012cv02130
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Leticia I Martinez and Gerardo R Silva
Waters, v. City and County of Denver, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Gail Waters
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Denver Zoological Foundation, Inc., Andre Derritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solarin v. Martinez
as 1:2012cv00659
Plaintiff:
Frederick O. Solarin
Defendant:
David (I) Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv02796
Plaintiff:
Paul Lanakila Campos
Defendant:
C. (I) A. Daniels, C. A. Daniels, W. (I) Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blum v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
James F. Blum
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis (I) Trani, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Simpson v. Martinez et al
as 3:2011cv02642
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Reene Simpson
Defendant:
I. Martinez and J. S. Warfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nelson A Martinez et al v. HSBC Bank USA NA et al
as 2:2011cv01861
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA NA and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff:
Gloria I Martinez and Nelson A Martinez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
