Cases 71 - 80 of 54,681
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Director Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrain A. Amonett, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto, Jose v. Staneic et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jose Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Staneic, CO II Billy, Sgt. Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Bure v. C. Gann, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
C. GANN, ERIN WILLIAMS, JASON SMILEY, Warden and others
Mark Mehner v. Furniture Design Studios, Inc., et al
as 24-2172
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Mehner
Defendant:
Furniture Design Studios, Inc., a New York Corporation, Panera, a Foreign Limited Liability Company, John Doe, individuals and others
Lawson v. Tong et al
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
William Tong, Sandra Arenas, Edward Miner Lamont, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiLELLA et al v. BURCHARD et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M DILELLA and FRANK GIORDANO
Defendant:
RENEE BURCHARD, KIRSTI GARLOCK, ANNA LAYMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. DeLoach et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Raymond Claudio
Defendant:
H.D. Gator DeLoach, Breckenricke, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Jane Doe Juror Number Ten
as 2:2024cv01074
Not Yet Classified:
Jane Doe Juror Number Ten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv06910
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, P. REX, MARIO VIERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
