Cases 71 - 80 of 516
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bolino v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02079
Petitioner:
Michael Bolino
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02076
Petitioner:
Kejuan Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Keith v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02064
Petitioner:
Anin M. Keith
Respondent:
Warden Kelly and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reynerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Reynerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelly v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Franson et al
as 7:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
Robert Franson, John G Edgar and Scott Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Franson et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023mc00005
Petitioner:
Robert Franson, John G Edgar and Scott Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
