Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Dawkins v. Vet-Sec et al
as 4:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
Vet-Sec, Alfred Cornidez and Unknown Knight-Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knight Transportation Services Incorporated v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2015cv01500
Plaintiff:
Knight Transportation Services Incorporated
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Patrick LaCross et al v. Knight Transportation Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00990
Plaintiff:
Patrick LaCross, Robert Lira and Matthew Lofton
Defendant:
Knight Transportation Incorporated, Knight Truck and Trailer Sales LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Knight
as 2:2014cv02034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danelle L Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Knight v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01967
Plaintiff:
Travis Allen Knight
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Durango Jail and Maricopa County Tent City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black Gold LLC et al v. Four Point Reclamation LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
Black Gold LLC and Todd Lease Group LLC
Defendant:
Seminole Oil Field Supply Incorporated, A. Feezel Corporation, Knight Oil Tools LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knight Brokerage LLC v. FreightX Incorporated
as 2:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Knight Brokerage LLC
Defendant:
FreightX Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Knight v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02080
Petitioner:
Shad Kendall Knight
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight Brokerage LLC v. TCH Carriers LLC
as 2:2014cv00533
Defendant:
TCH Carriers LLC
Plaintiff:
Knight Brokerage LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
