Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Staten v. Stolle et al
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Staten
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, CPL. Winn and P. Bryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Baptist et al
as 1:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Albert Mayo
Defendant:
E. Baptist and Ken Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Street v. Stolle et al
as 2:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Street
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Sgt. Moisett, Sgt. Bendily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Stolle et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Reyes Thomas
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Varguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dalessio v. Stolle
as 1:2013cv01521
Plaintiff:
Tadd M. Dalessio
Defendant:
Ken Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Norfolk Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Whitaker
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff's Office, Sheriff McCabe, Lt. Col. Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brouckaert v. Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01497
Plaintiff:
Ryan Brouckaert
Defendant:
Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office, Conmed, Abdul Jamuladeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Javon Stephenson v. P. Bryan
as 13-7868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVON STEPHENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
P. BRYAN, Classification Department Deputy; Individually and in Official Capacity, KATHY VARGAS, Lieutenant; Ranking Officer in Intelligence Department; Individually and in Official Capacity, G. DAVENPORT, Corporal; Officer at Virginia Beach Correctional Center on G Team; Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Witter v. Stolle et al
as 1:2013cv01264
Plaintiff:
Brett Witter
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Lowe and Deputy Luff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prison Legal News v. Stolle et al
as 2:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
