Cases 71 - 80 of 323
Dees v. Lamar et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Richardson, O Walker, Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L. v. Benton et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
Lamar Harris, Tim J Dunavant, Timothy Vess Benton and others
Plaintiff:
J. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Lamar Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. State of Alabama (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00585
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamar Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00560
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamar Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00453
Defendant:
Tracy Jones and Alabama Pardons & Paroles
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lamar Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Captain McCovery, Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Lee and Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duggan v. Wavley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00329
Plaintiff:
Parrish Lamar Duggan
Defendant:
Elmore, AL DOC, Lt. Wavley, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Shelby County Jail Administrator et al
as 2:2020cv00600
Petitioner:
Jason Lamar Jefferson
Respondent:
Shelby County Jail Administrator and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
