Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Carmon v. Cowart et al
as 1:2026cv01021
Plaintiff:
Ylonda Yvette Carmon and Wilson
Defendant:
Liz Cowart, Madison County, TN, Madison County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Willis et al v. Dowies et al
as 5:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
Verdia Willis and Ralph Ridley, Jr
Defendant:
Sam Dowies, Liz Murrill and Danny Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. Murrill et al
as 3:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Klein
Defendant:
Liz Murrill and Rachel P. Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wetzel v. Abbott et al
as 3:2026cv00115
Petitioner:
Andrew Wetzel
Respondent:
Francis M Abbott and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv20297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tovar v. Walmart, Inc.
as 8:2026cv00118
Plaintiff:
Liz Nelory Fierro Tovar
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Pretrial Service:
Curt Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wetzel v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2026cv00069
Petitioner:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Respondent:
State of Louisiana and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Netchoice v. Murrill
as 26-30016
Plaintiff:
Netchoice
Defendant:
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana and Mike Dupree, in his official capacity as Director of the Public Protection Division, Louisiana Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
State of Florida, Floor64, Incorporated, doing business as Copia Institute, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
