Cases 71 - 80 of 590
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kendrick Jackson v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11102
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENDRICK M. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McDaniel v. The People of The City of New
as 22-708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis McDaniel
Defendant / Appellee:
The People of The City of New York, Police Officer Christopher Zollino, Shield No. 27732, Daniel Hull, TRN #19192 and others
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Desiree Sedehi, Assistant District Attorney, Honorable Judge E. Biden and others
O'Shea v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
John F. O'Shea
Defendant:
Wellpath, David M. Jackson, John J. Archard and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR John F. OShea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05045
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05043
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05042
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05044
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Jackson
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Rueben Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Laura M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
