Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Miles v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Miles
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
MILES v. LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv01077
Defendant:
LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MILES
Mediator:
KENNETH P. CARLSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Lewis et al
as 5:2013ct03218
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lee
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Kenneth Lassiter, Y. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Guice et al
as 5:2013ct03193
Plaintiff:
Antoine Montez Miles
Defendant:
David Guice, George Solomon, Gwen Norveil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles et al v. Paczosa et al
as 7:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
John J. Miles and Susanne R. Miles
Defendant:
John Richard Paczosa, III and 2001 model Onslow Bay motorboat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Lee v. Urieta et al
as 5:2013ct03155
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lee
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Urieta, Kenneth Lassiter, Daniel G. Mehari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARY v. STRICKLAND et al
as 1:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Defendant:
JAMES STRICKLAND, NURSE JACKIE, NURSE DEBBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. TABOR CITY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2012cv01265
Plaintiff:
BILLY MILES
Defendant:
TABOR CITY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Miles Builders, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant:
Miles Builders, Inc., Douglas R. Miles, Linda P. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
