Cases 71 - 80 of 100
The Estate of B.H., et al. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 25-7760
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF B.H., JOHN HERNDON, J.H., a Minor and others
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC.
Fendelander v. Netflix, Inc.
as 5:2025cv10521
Plaintiff:
Michelle Fendelander
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pellegrino v. Joun, et al
as 25-2124
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS PELLEGRINO
Defendant:
JUDGE MYONG J. JOUN, TIMOTHY D. SULLIVAN, CLERKS OF FEDERAL AND STATE COURT and others
Interested Party:
PATRA ALIARDO, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING COURTS and others
Eric Hunt v. Irene Weisberg Zisblatt et al
as 2:2025cv10750
Plaintiff:
Eric Hunt
Defendant:
Irene Zisblatt, Steven Spielberg, Universal Studios LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ESSEX MOTORS, INC. v. NETFLIX, INC.
as 2:2025cv17230
Plaintiff:
ESSEX MOTORS, INC. doing business as Square One Auto
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lauren Wild v. Gullane et al
as 2:2025cv10495
Plaintiff:
Lauren Wild
Defendant:
Gullane, Fabiano Gullane, Caio Gullane and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lichfield v. Kubler, et al
as 25-4135
Plaintiff:
NARVIN LICHFIELD
Defendant:
KATHERINE KUBLER and NETFLIX, INC.
O'Toole, et al. v. Nickelodeon Animation Studio, Inc., et al.
as 25-6720
Plaintiff:
HUNTER J. O'TOOLE and ALETHEA O'TOOLE
Defendant:
NICKELODEON ANIMATION STUDIO, INC., NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., PARAMOUNT GLOBAL, INC. and others
Netflix, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.
as 26-1005
Plaintiff:
NETFLIX, INC.
Defendant:
BROADCOM INC. and VMWARE LLC
Cary Jones v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv09259
Plaintiff:
Cary Jones
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., GETTY IMAGES (US), INC., BBH Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
