Cases 71 - 80 of 287
Gann v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Honda Motor Company Limited et al
as 5:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Denso Corporation, Denso International America Inc, Honda Motor Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Tucker Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
McDaniel v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv08017
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Oliver McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burgess v. Oliver
as 1:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Trey Oliver
Plaintiff:
Russell L. Burgess
Respondent:
Mobile County Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Atwood v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00048
Defendant:
Captain Stallworth, Seaton Fitzgerald, Noah Price "Tre Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Gaston Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
