Cases 71 - 80 of 25,232
Trujillo-Perez v. Garland
as 24-60262
Petitioner:
Luis Angel Trujillo-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Patterson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04065
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Patterson, Marcia Pearce, Lanaye Peeples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
PEREZ v. MERENDINO
as 1:2024cv06508
Petitioner:
MARCO PEREZ
Respondent:
STEVEN MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreno v. Kite Environmental Inc.
as 1:2024cv22019
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Horacio Perez Moreno
Defendant:
Kite Environmental Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Perez v. OFAC et al
as 1:2024cv22050
Plaintiff:
Gaddiel David Perez
Defendant:
OFAC and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Perez v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Edward Perez
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PEREZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00820
Petitioner:
MARILENIS PEREZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Rosado-Ramires v. Five Security Innovation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Karla M. Rosado-Ramires
Defendant:
Five Security Innovation, Inc., Noel Perez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hopkins v. Cruz et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Joe R. Hopkins
Defendant:
Felix Cruz, Secretary Of The Deparment Of Corrections, Elliott Ernesto Perez Lugo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
