Cases 71 - 80 of 15,681
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Juarez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dinah Juarez and Jacinto Ramirez, Jr.
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Garcia et al v. STARR COUNTY TEXAS et al
as 7:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maria N Garcia and Jose Bazan
Defendant:
Starr County Texas, Gocha A Ramirez and Gerardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Enedina Ramirez-Lopez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11249
Petitioner:
ENEDINA LISET RAMIREZ-LOPEZ and KIMBERLY MAYDALY CHAVEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
