Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Washington v. Roberts
as 5:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Marcus B. Washington
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Donaldson v. Roberts, et al
as 09-3143
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERICK DONALDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, JR. and STEVEN SIX, Attorney General of Kansas
Hooks v. Roberts et al
as 5:2009cv03090
Petitioner:
Anthony Hooks
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2009cv03077
Petitioner:
Joshua James Robertson
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pineda v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03284
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Pineda
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 08-3235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA J. ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity and others
Ellibee v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03189
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel W. Ellibee
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, Jr, William J Cauble, Gary L Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Donaldson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03149
Petitioner:
Erick Donaldson
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts, Jr and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson-Helsper v. South St Paul, City et al
as 0:2008cv00549
Plaintiff:
Raymond Robert Wilson-Helsper
Defendant:
South St Paul, City, Michael P. Smith and Mark E. Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Van Houten v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03012
Plaintiff:
James E Van Houten
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, (fnu) Heimegardner, (fnu) Dragoo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
