Cases 71 - 80 of 218
Bhattacharya v. Hecla Mining Company et al
as 1:2019cv05719
Plaintiff:
Arun Bhattacharya
Defendant:
Lindsay A. Hall, Lawrence P. Radford, Phillips S. Baker, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Emma Gluck, Dr. Robert Gluck, Sara Gluck and others
Bruce Fiegel v. Phillips S. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv01455
Defendant:
Terry V. Rogers, George R. Johnson, Lindsay A. Hall and others
Nominal Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company
Plaintiff:
Bruce Fiegel
Cardenas v. Baker, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv01466
Defendant:
Terry V. Rogers, George R. Johnson, Theodore Crumley and others
Nominal Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Cardenas
Erasmo Garza v. K. Skinnier, et al
as 19-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERASMO MARTINEZ GARZA
Defendant / Appellee:
K. SKINNIER, A. FRANKO, M. SARHANI, Asst Warden and others
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02651
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, CRAIG FAERBER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02752
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, HEIDI H. HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Trustees of the Colt Bequest
as 3:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Laurie Baker St. Laurent and Sharen S Baker
Defendant:
Trustees of the Colt Bequest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01547
Defendant:
ERIC BRENNEN, SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, MARK S. ZEMELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Edwards v. Fischer et al
as 6:2018cv06851
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
William Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. JONES ET AL
as 4:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, R ROSSELL, CENTURION HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
