Cases 71 - 80 of 165
USA v. Mark Johnson
as 16-2033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK SAMUEL JOHNSON
Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Johnson et al
as 5:2016cv11880
Plaintiff:
Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
SAMUEL JOHNSON, LAVELLE WHITAKER, CLORA FUNERAL & CREMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Intense Movers, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Intense Movers, Inc. and Alexander Leute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shamburger et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sydney Shamburger , Lewis Campbell, Jr. , Dennis Northcutt and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01838
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel Ewing v. United State
as 16-1321
Petitioner - Appellant:
Samuel Johnson Ewing
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Biddle et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Biddle , Kathryn Chandler , Anita Fritz and others
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ronnie Davis v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 15-30892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE KEITH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, LYNN COOPER, BLANE LACHNEY and others
Johnson v. Hall
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Phillip Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
