Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 544
Air Force Officer v. Lloyd Austin, III, et al
as 22-11200
Plaintiff / Appellee: AIR FORCE OFFICER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, III, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force and ROBERT MILLER, Individually and in his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15519
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) et al
as 5:2022cv00392
Plaintiff: Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Housing for Urban Development (HUD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lupo et al v. Austin et al
as 2:2022cv02175
Plaintiff: Kyle Lupo, Jason Mariano and Christopher Nurthen
Defendant: Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary of the Nav Carlos Del Toro and Secretary of Navy Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jonathan Dunn v. Lloyd Austin, III, et al
as 22-15286
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN DUNN, Lieutenant Colonel
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, US Secretary of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, US Secretary of the Air Force, GREGORY M. HAYNES, Colonel and others
Amicus Curiae: TODD ZYWICKI, Professor and JEFFREY SINGER, M.D.
Nashaat Daoud v. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff: NASHAAT DAOUD
Defendant: GEN. KENNETH F. MCKENZIE JR., in his official capacity as Commander of the United States Central Command, LLOYD JAMES AUSTIN III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, United States of America, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maxine Shepard v. Department Of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAXINE SHEPARD
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, SECRETARY DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD AUSTIN and others
Robert, et al v. Austin, et al
as 22-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAN ROBERT, SSGT, U.S. Army and HOLLIE MULVIHILL, SSGT, USMC and other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and JANET WOODCOCK, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-10077
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Craft Crewmen 1-5, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Lloyd Austin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, individually and in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
William Green, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-35022
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM L. GREEN and M. R. G., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS BENEFITS MANAGEMENT, MIKE ELMSTROM, Commanding Officer SWFPAC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?