Cases 71 - 80 of 1,307
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
HARPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HARPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Troy Robinson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-2453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael DayIn re: Michael Day
as 23-2323
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL FRANCISCO DAY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Gary Davis v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 23-2280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
EDMONDS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
MELISSA EDMONDS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Jones v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Darrell Williams v. Allegheny County, et al
as 23-2190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, as owner and operator of John J. Kane Regional Center-SC, DBA Kane Scott Center, AETNA HEALTH INC, AETNA INC and others
Demetrius Bailey v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 23-2170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
