Cases 71 - 80 of 672
Dunahue v. Straughn et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
William F Straughn, Maurice Culclager, C Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gover v. The White House Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05017
Plaintiff:
Benny M Gover
Defendant:
The White House Company, Inc. and Mortiman Sons of Peridition Employees and Contractors
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
White v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Levi Lloyd White
Defendant:
Eric Moore, Poinsett County Jail, NEA Hospitol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. McCune et al
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Brent Anthony Torres
Defendant:
Judge Mark McCone, Crawford County Detention Center, Dr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nail v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nail
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Antonnette Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
George Dwayne Guthrie, II
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Antonnette Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2022cv04117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, James Ross, James Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rangel v. White
as 6:2022cv06124
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Rangel
Defendant:
Gary White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
