Cases 81 - 90 of 280
Carey v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Franetta Riley , Captain Logan and LaShanda Hails
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2014cv01330
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Riley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gilliland v. Lightner et al
as 1:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Gilliland
Defendant:
Wanda Lightner and Hayward E. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jeanette T. Moore
Defendant:
City of Selma, Alabama , William T. Riley, III and Jonathan McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris et al v. Aschenbrenner Trucking Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Wardell Morris and June Cooper Morris
Defendant:
Aschenbrenner Trucking Inc. and Ray Dean Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Debra Jackson , The Estate of Bill Jackson , The Estate of Keoshia Hill and others
Defendant:
City of Selma, Alabama , William T. Riley, III , Sgt. Fulford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00943
Plaintiff:
Clark L. Posey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Frank Albright, Victor L. Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sides v. Riley et al
as 5:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
Lynda Alma Sides
Respondent:
Jack C Riley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
