Cases 81 - 90 of 201
Preston v. Payne et al
as 6:2021cv06114
Plaintiff:
Derenzo Deshon Preston
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rory L. Griffin, Warden DeAngelo Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lion/Jones v. Doe
as 6:2021cv06090
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Stump, Matthew Swift and others
Plaintiff:
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Lusk, et al
as 4:2021cv04037
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR, Miller County, Arkansas, Michael Lusk and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Division of Community Correction et al
as 6:2021cv06072
Defendant:
Supervised Sanction Center, Omega Unit, Arkansas Division of Community Correction and Warden Emsweller
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dews v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dews and Maurice T Dews
Defendant:
Gene Beasley, Does Associate Warden, Forrest City; Captain, Forrest City and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ruh et al
as 6:2021cv06046
Defendant:
Warden Ruh, Lieutenant Lisa Taylor, Mr. Beaty and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walker et al
as 4:2021cv04033
Defendant:
Sergeant Griffie, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Walker et al
as 4:2021cv04034
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion and Warden Jeffie Walker
Plaintiff:
Tralynn D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. Runion et al
as 4:2021cv04024
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Sheriff Jackie Runion, Sergeant Hanning and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Deray Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Runion et al
as 4:2021cv04021
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain Golden Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
