Cases 81 - 90 of 614
Galeas v. Gibson et al
as 5:2022ct03366
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Adam Gibson and Lieutenant Logan Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gray v. Outlaw et al
as 5:2022ct03339
Plaintiff:
Reginald Corey Gray
Defendant:
Venetia S. Outlaw, Shakeeba M. Hudson, Lt. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Miller et al
as 5:2022ct03340
Plaintiff:
Montreal J. Perry
Defendant:
Sgt. Miller and Hyde Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Coile
as 5:2022ct03336
Plaintiff:
Calvin Miller
Defendant:
J. Taplie Coile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Cathlene Brewer, Jeffrey Hopkins, James T. Maxwell and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Bartlett v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Marlon Bartlett
Defendant:
FNU Miller, William Wise and Dexter Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Roman Derrick Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary L. McFadden, Mecklenburg Sheriff Department, County of Mecklenburg Government Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLDHAM v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER OLDHAM
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, LAWRENCE R. CUNNINGHAM, LORENZO GALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
