Cases 81 - 90 of 2,050
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1089
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Watts v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Morris Thompson, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cullen v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Barker v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark A. Barker
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3612
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Gary Webster v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cogburn v. WellPath et al
as 4:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Cogburn
Defendant:
WellPath, Does ACC Security Staff and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tullos v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
John Tullos
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Clayton Evens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Tremain Huggins
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
