Cases 81 - 90 of 185
Walker v. MetLife Insurance Company USA
as 1:2015cv01408
Plaintiff:
Mary B. Walker
Defendant:
MetLife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Merchants Bonding Company v. Apex Metal Fabrication, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22394
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company
Defendant:
Apex Metal Fabrication, Inc. , Donald B. Walker and Helen B. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
WALKER v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04623
Plaintiff:
JUANITA B. WALKER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00248
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Walker v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Zen B. Walker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Permanent Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Defendant:
100 Foot Wide Permanent Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines, United States of America , Georgia Anne Pohocsucut Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Maurice B Walker v. The People of State of California
as 2:2015cv00951
Respondent:
The People of State of California
Petitioner:
Maurice B Walker
William Walker v. Gary Beckstrom
as 14-6488
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY BECKSTROM, Warden
Coe v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv09952
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Coe
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Godinez, B. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taite v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Taite
Defendant:
Spencer B. Walker and Steve M. Sirmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
