Cases 81 - 90 of 249
Arbelaez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06543
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Arbelaez , Luz Arbelaez , Deborah Arbelaez and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Doris Lopez, Ryan Boylan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Root
as 17-2568
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Progovitz, Caleb Doane, Derek Strassle and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ryan T. Root
BOYLAN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02810
Plaintiff:
DIANE BOYLAN and JAMES BOYLAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Root (Fletcher)
as 17-2364
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ryan T. Root, Richard Progovitz, Caleb Doane and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kent Fletcher
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boylan v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05504
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Boylan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gez Agolli v. CA Progressive Medical Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04665
Plaintiff:
Gez Agolli
Defendant:
Kevin Banion, David C. Bianconi, Tim Boylan and others
Walker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04726
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker
Defendant:
City of New York, Brian Winrow and Ryan Boylan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv04467
Plaintiff:
Immanuel Campbell , Rubin Carter , Markees Sharkey and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Migel Villanueva, Josue Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
