Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BURNS et al v. LACEY et al
as 1:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
JANICE B. BURNS and KENNITH D. BURNS
Defendant:
JOHN A. LACEY, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. and TRULITE GLASS & ALUMINUM SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
SAVAGE v. ATCLARK et al
as 1:2015cv00967
Defendant:
ATCLARK, BURNS, PAYNE and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON et al v. BURNS MACHINERY MOVING & INSTALLATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00649
Defendant:
BURGIN PROPERTIES LLC, BURNS MACHINERY MOVING & INSTALLATIONS INC., NATIONWIDE SERVICES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROBINSON and DAVID THARP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. NorthShore Health Center et al
as 2:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chanel Johnson
Defendant:
NorthShore Health Center , Nadine P Burns , Health Care Defendant No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Burns Rent-Alls, Inc. v. Sharpe et al
as 3:2014cv01958
Plaintiff:
Burns Rent-Alls, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Sharpe and Aays Rent-All Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BURNS
as 1:2014cv01577
Plaintiff:
MARK BURNS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VAN CLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv00349
Defendant:
BARNES, ROBERT BURNS, K. BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VAN CLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Porter County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ryan Burns
Defendant:
Porter County Jail, Ron Taylor, John Widup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Hodum v. Mittal Steel USA Inc
as 2:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Hodum
Defendant:
Mittal Steel USA Inc and ARCELOR MITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC improperly sued as MITTAL STEEL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
