Cases 81 - 90 of 116
Holden v. Burns et al
as 8:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gail Holden
Defendant:
Rusty Burns , Mike Freeman and Jean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Bush
as 8:2013cv03392
Petitioner:
Artie Burns
Respondent:
D Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. i-sys Corporation
as 2:2013cv02376
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Burns
Defendant:
i-sys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Daniel Island Riverside Developers LLC et al v. Oaks at Rivers Edge Property Owners Assocation Inc, The et al
as 2:2013cv01249
Plaintiff:
Daniel Island Riverside Developers LLC and Carriage Hill Associates of Charleston LLC
Defendant:
Oaks at Rivers Edge Property Owners Assocation Inc, The, John E Atkinson, Joan D Strandquist and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Burns v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
Shirley Burns
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc , Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson v. Fryar et al
as 3:2012cv03505
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Karen Fryar, Vanessa Cooper, Warren Giese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Burn Lounge Inc
as 3:2012mc00309
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Burn Lounge Inc
Guidetti v. Greenville, County of et al
as 6:2011cv01249
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Guidetti
Defendant:
Greenville, County of, Sheriff Department, Greenville County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Burn et al
as 1:2010cv03046
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gordon
Defendant:
Fish Burn and SC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kanapaux et al v. Burns et al
as 2:2010cv02785
Plaintiff:
Robert Bernard Kanapaux and Scott Lawrence Kanapaux
Defendant:
J D Burns , T Brommer and Charleston, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
