Cases 81 - 90 of 1,193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Quirch Foods, LLC., et al v.Cargill, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv14659
Plaintiff:
QUIRCH FOODS, LLC (f/k/a QUIRCH FOODS CO.), BUTTS FOODS, LP (f/k/a BUTTS FOODS, INC.), QUIRCH LOUISIANA LLC (f/k/a SCARIANO BROTHERS, LLC, a/k/a SCARIANO WHOLESALE FOOD DISTRIBUTION and others
Defendant:
CARGILL, INC, CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION (A/K/A CARGILL PROTEIN, A/K/A CARGILL PROTEIN - NORTH AMERICA), JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stergen v. Stergen et al
as 4:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Stergen
Defendant:
Megan Stergen, Beth Storey, Aleta Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aldi Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv02868
Plaintiff:
Aldi Inc.
Defendant:
Cargill Inc, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cargill v. Barron
as 23-2246
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUINCETTA YVONNE CARGILL
Respondent / Appellee:
HOWARD C BARRON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cargill v. Warden Healy
as 4:2023cv01755
Petitioner:
Tammeco A. Cargill
Respondent:
Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
