Cases 81 - 90 of 591
Hooker v. Sly et al
as 8:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Rosa Sly, Michele Wooten, Ryan Redlawsk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 8:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Jones v. Carlton
as 1:2022cv21161
Plaintiff:
Adam Quincy Jones
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Deloach et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Jones
Defendant:
Sgt. Walter S. Deloach, Correctional Officer Carlton, P. D. Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04685
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GEORGE CLAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeffrey v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv80359
Plaintiff:
Michele Jeffrey and Carlton Jeffrey
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooker v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Carlton Brown
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Brown v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Carlton Brown
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Rose v. Bauer et al
as 2:2022cv14009
Plaintiff:
Augustus Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Dan Lewis Vaughn, Michael Carlton Heisey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
