Cases 81 - 90 of 168
HUTCHINS v. HOUSE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
KIRK R HOUSE, BRUCE A WILLIAMS, MELISSA J WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petley v. San Diego County Credit Union et al
as 3:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Petley
Defendant:
San Diego County Credit Union and MCT Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BALLISTER v. SHAIKH et al
as 2:2016cv01691
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BALLISTER, III
Defendant:
JUNAID R. SHAIKH and COUNTY OF UNION DIVISION OF MEDICAL EXAMINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernier v. San Diego County Credit Union et al
as 3:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
Rejeanne Bernier
Defendant:
San Diego County Credit Union and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguon v. Progressive Management Systems et al
as 3:2015cv02474
Plaintiff:
Erik P.B. Aguon
Defendant:
Progressive Management Systems, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Synchrony Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Aguon v. Progressive Management Systems et al
as 3:2015cv02473
Plaintiff:
Genevieve K. Aguon
Defendant:
Progressive Management Systems, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Synchrony Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEWTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv06426
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF UNION, UNION COUNTY CRIMINAL DIV. MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
