Cases 81 - 90 of 2,961
Jallow v. Geffner et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Yaya Jallow
Defendant:
Edward I. Geffner, Leticia Randle, Robert Lashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calderon v. Covello
as 24-122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CALDERON
Defendant / Appellee:
P. COVELLO, Warden
Calderon v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers, Inc., Kroger Co., The and NAKS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romero Cardoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2
Petitioner:
CESAR ADALBERTO ROMERO CARDOZA, HELEN ROXANA JORGE CALDERON and MATEO SEBASTIAN ROMERO JORGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kory et al v. Bonta et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kory, Le Trinh Hoang, Brian Tyson and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Reji Varghese and Erika Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calderon v. Covello
as 3:2023cv06560
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
P Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diaz-Oneil v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority et al
as 3:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Jaime A. Diaz-Oneil and Jaime A. Diaz-O'Neill
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Doriel Pagan, Raquel Matos-Rolon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
