Cases 81 - 90 of 206
Boston v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Regina Boston
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Augustine v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Ophelia Augustine
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Miss Jones, LLC v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2018cv01446
Defendant:
Mount Sinai Queens, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Shah Alam and others
Plaintiff:
Miss Jones, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mattie v. Beaufort County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lewis Mattie
Defendant:
Beaufort County Sheriff's Department, Jason P Prusinowski, S Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moten v. Southfield Quality Cars Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13685
Plaintiff:
Terri Moten
Defendant:
Southfield Quality Cars Inc., Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., GWC Warranty Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
PROCTOR v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv01966
Plaintiff:
CHARNITA PROCTOR
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE, N.A. , CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC. , LIBERTY MUTUAL AUTO AND HOME SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green-Mobley v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
Toya Green-Mobley
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
