Cases 81 - 90 of 2,460
Bowlds v. Bridges
as 5:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Charles R Bowlds
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grefer v. Smith
as 5:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Jerrod W. Smith, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv15459
Plaintiff:
Charles R Meyer and Bettye L Meyer
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70035
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Johnston v. Knight Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Charles R Johnston
Defendant:
Knight Specialty Insurance Company, NonStop Logistics, LLC, Ajaydeep Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Babakr v. Fowles, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUZAFAR BABAKR
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. JACOB T. FOWLES, DR. DOROTHY M. DALEY, DR. STEVEN W. MAYNARD-MOODY and others
Grefer v. Valdina
as 5:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
C. Valdina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grefer v. Cornelius
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Det. F. Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grefer v. Chirco
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Norman Chirco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grefer v. Cayuga County et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Cayuga County and Lloyd E. Haskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
