Cases 81 - 90 of 3,634
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
KOZLOFF v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
RACHEL KOZLOFF
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN OF SCI MUNCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. SHIPIRO et al
as 2:2023cv04879
Plaintiff:
JOHN JONES, JR
Defendant:
JOSH SHIPIRO, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2023cv02040
Petitioner:
Curtis Clay Phillips, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Deputy Warden Joseph McCoy, WARDEN AND/OR DEPUTY John (Doe) Haidel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPRING v. WATERS et al
as 2:2023cv04883
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SPRING
Defendant:
TROOPER RYAN WATERS, TROOPER TARA GASSENMEYER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREAKIRON v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2023cv02140
Petitioner:
TROY ALLEN BREAKIRON
Respondent:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2023cv01959
Petitioner:
Noel L. Brown
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Warden of SCI-Somerset and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04645
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
