Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,371
Smith v. Matteson
as 24-1798
Petitioner: CRISTIN CONRAD SMITH
Respondent: GISELLE MATTESON
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff: William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant: United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
GUL v. BLINKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00787
Plaintiff: RUBINA GUL
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, CONRAD TRIBBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Green et al v. Biden Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01975
Plaintiff: Frank Green and Robert Conrad
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden Jr., Gina M. Raimondo, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff: MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant: RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Czajkowski v. Allen, et al
as 24-1097
Plaintiff: CONRAD J. CZAJKOWSKI
Defendant: MICHAEL ALLEN, KIMBERLY KARN and REBECCA BRIGGS
Conrad v. Hart Consumer Products Inc
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: Michael Conrad
Defendant: Hart Consumer Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kijek v. NaturallYou by Terry Conrad LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00328
Plaintiff: Esther Kijek
Defendant: NATURALLYOU BY TERRY CONRAD LLC and Terry Conrad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Harris (Edgar)
as 24-619
Defendant: JAMAL HARRIS, KERRY PARRIS, CONRAD EDGAR and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sawyer v. Breglio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Sawyer
Defendant: John Breglio, Kathryn Bregman, David Clossey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?