Cases 81 - 90 of 94
City of Monroe v. Otwell
as 3:2009cv00394
Plaintiff:
City of Monroe
Defendant:
Herbert Otwell, Quetin Holmes, Gaye Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boles et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06001
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Boles et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00732
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DUNN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81591
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EARLY D. DUNN
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TRUPEI v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TRUPEI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, NORMAN MINETA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carr v. Murray et al
as 3:2007cv00777
Plaintiff:
William Carr
Defendant:
Tyone Murray, Rod R Blagojevich, Lisa Murray Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. THE BUDD COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv65831
Plaintiff:
DELBERT D. DUNN
Defendant:
THE BUDD COMPANY, THE BUDD COMPANY, THE BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dunn v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2007cv00216
Plaintiff:
Michael D Dunn and Michael D Dunn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
