Cases 81 - 90 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00030
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. Department of Homeland Security USCIS
as 5:2020cv00004
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security USCIS and Tracy Johns
Petitioner:
Nicholas Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Danglar v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv05512
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Attorney General William Barr, J Suntanto and others
Not Classified By Court:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLATAN et al v. CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 7:2019cv00199
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
SPINDY CHARLATAN and MARIE SAINVIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ONTANO-ANTUNEZ v. SUTANTO et al
as 5:2019cv00340
Defendant:
SUTANTO and US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
BRAUIO ONTANO-ANTUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00104
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GUZMAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 5:2019cv00252
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, AGENT JONES, AGENT REED and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROMERO GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00249
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
